August 28, 2012

When the Mission Becomes Protesting

by Eric Davis

OSA 1Recently, Operation Save America (a Texas-based, anti-abortion group) came to our town for an organized protest against a local doctor who is known as the only abortion provider in the state. As a heads-up regarding their actions, the OSA invited local pastors and Christian ministries to discuss the upcoming protests. Though the voices were unanimous in graciously requesting that OSA not protest this year (for a second year in a row), they came anyways.

OSA requested that local churches in the area link arms to protest along with them as they sounded their voice throughout the town. For several days, protestors lined boulevards, walkways, school areas, and downtown with large posters picturing graphic images of aborted babies and signs with aggressive slogans towards the doctor.

To top off the events, and in one of the more ironic moments, OSA protested several local churches at their Sunday morning gatherings, which resulted in a handful of violations, citations, and a diffused scuffle between an individual and a protester. According to local police, it was the busiest law-enforcement day of OSA’s week in town.

As one would expect in a town not lacking wisenheimer flavor like ours, locals responded. Among other moves, a local ranch parked a stretched truck and trailer along an entire city block, covering the protester’s display. During the 2011 protests, a local drove his car into OSA’s exhibit to communicate his thoughts (no one injured, thankfully). In light of that, the local paper issued an article preceding this year’s protest encouraging locals to refrain from scrapping with protestors. Then, just prior to this year’s protests, about 2500 locals were stirred up to form an anti-protest group to state loud and clear that OSA and their approach was unwelcome.

Wyoming-Display

Aside from creating small-town ruckus, situations like these done in the name of Christ provide great opportunities for us to think through what the church really should be doing. While our church whole-heartedly loves people, whether born, or unborn (and have been involved in biblically sound pro-life ministries), the leadership declined linking arms with OSA as we felt they are misguided in a few ways:

1) A misunderstanding of the problem and solution.

OSA appears to attribute the abortion problem largely to the church. One of their objectives states: “the repentance of the Church of Jesus Christ is our ultimate goal. As the Church changes its heart toward unborn children, God Himself will hear from heaven, forgive our sin, and bring healing to our land.” During the pre-protest meeting, one of the OSA leaders concluded by saying, “Christians are responsible for most of the abortions in this nation.” This explains their frequent talk of corporate repentance, using phrases like, “We must repent for our nation and for the church in America.” In other words, if the church repents of her contribution to abortion, then problem solved. This thinking explains the guy on the main drag for two years in a row holding up a 10 ft. by 5 ft. sign that says, “Where is your church?” calling out local churches for not protesting with them.

The problems with this are numerous. No one can repent on behalf of another. We pray to God for the repentance of the unregenerate in our nation, but we cannot do the repenting for them. Each individual is responsible for his/her own sin before God. I can no more repent for others than I can vicariously come to faith in Christ for another. I can grieve the sin in and around me, but I can only repent of my own actions. Plus, the church is no more responsible for the murder of the unborn than of the born. The true church love Christ, people, and will be held accountable for failure to obey her mission and preach the whole counsel of God, but not for murders she did not commit.

On top of that, as fired up about sin as OSA is, they are not fired up enough. Again, though this sin is an atrocity, OSA limits the scope of sin to abortion and the lack of protesting the issue. They miss the point from Scripture that sin is far more comprehensive. The church’s repentance and eradication of abortion will not bring healing to the land, genuine conversion will. True healing comes from the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit causing a mourning over one’s comprehensive failure to love God, along with a rejoicing at the righteousness provided by Jesus Christ through faith. Healing will be clear, not so much by the absence of abortion (though we greatly desire that), but a presence of embracing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and the abiding fruit of the Spirit.

Consequently, this misunderstanding of the problem gives way to a misguided solution. Because they see the problem as the church’s failure to repent for the nation, their solution is to make disciples of OSA: individuals who join their protesting movement by hitting the streets with them, carrying signs of graphic images, stirring up legal trouble, and calling on the church to repent.Mission of the Church

More than making disciples who are angry about the atrocity of abortion, Christ calls the church to make disciples who are angry at all sin, including the hidden idolatry of the heart and at the deceitful pride which lurks and manifests itself in, for example, angry downcrys at the culture.

However, let’s be realistic: things will go from bad to worse (2 Tim 3:13), and there will be no comprehensive healing from the top down in any nation until Christ returns to set up his kingdom once and for all. That is no excuse for inaction. On the contrary, the church needs to stay fervently centered on her mission: making disciples by repentance and faith in Jesus Christ through his substitutionary atoning, and teaching them to observe everything he has commanded. And in doing so, disciples will be made, resulting in repentance of underlying heart-level wickedness fueling the idolatry which results in abortion: worshiping ourselves and our comfortable lives over loving other people.

I understand that OSA does not necessarily claim to be a local church. But regardless, if they are a parachurch organization, the fact that they insist on the church embracing their mission shows a grave misunderstanding of the biblical mandate to make disciples. So with the insistence on protesting as the solution, it seems that OSA presupposes Christ’s mission of the church (making disciples) is an insufficient one in itself for meeting humanity’s greatest need and accomplishing true transformation. Their approach seems to say, “we need something greater, something more effective, and powerful since the plain old way of Christ building his church through making disciples isn’t good enough when it comes to these real big issues.” But, though Christ and his Apostles were surrounded by legal moral atrocity in every city they went, the mission was the same: make disciples, gather them into local churches, and repeat.

Consequently, OSA risks an unbalanced gospel, as evidenced by the misguided understanding of the problem and solution. Their gospel seems to be: repent of failing to be more fired up about abortion and embrace civil action with us. But the biblical gospel is: repent of failing to love and honor God as he deserves and embrace Christ and his finished work on the cross.

2) A method supported by bad hermeneutics.

OSA’s approach is largely backed by OT verses ripped out of context. One of the main reasons they misunderstand the mission of the church is due to a poor hermeneutic. For example, Deuteronomy 21:1-3 was quoted as the reason our town is comprehensively responsible and guilty for the existence of local abortions.

On top of that, the KJV-only feel coupled with a generous use of exclamation points in their literature raises red flags.

3) An appearance of a martyr complex.

At certain times, the ministry seems to highlight run-ins with the law as a badge of honor. But their altercations have the appearance of unnecessarily seeking out, and publicizing, civil disobedience. The civil violations which OSA has received were not necessary to the mission of the church. For example, when locals heard they planned to protest at a Boy Scout antler auction on our towOSA Town Squaren square, a local judge granted a temporary restraining order against the group within a few blocks of the area. OSA violated the restraining order and was arrested, for what they claimed, was “preaching the gospel.”

The move was unnecessary both to the mission of the church and faithfully preaching the gospel. The restraining order was not requiring sin. This incident, as others like it on the group’s website, had the appearance of seeking out civil altercations for the wrong reasons. But unless we are required to sin, “Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God” (Rom 13:1).

As would be expected, if they have the wrong goal and the wrong method, they have a wrong interpretation of the opposition they encounter. They see opposition as persecution, when in reality it is a result of their foolishness and pride.

4) A lack of wisdom in the approach.

In some sense, this was a case of “mostly right cause, really wrong method.” As God’s people, our method of approach to the world needs to be seasoned:

“Conduct yourselves with wisdom toward outsiders, making the most of the opportunity. Let your speech always be with grace, as though seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should respond to each person” (Col 4:5-6).

pinch-of-saltPaul also says, “First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men, for kings and all who are in authority, so that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity” (1 Tim 2:1-2). The context into which these commands were given at least equaled, if not surpassed, the flagrant sin of our culture. Even so, the church is to make disciples through the local church in a dignified manner.

At the end of the day, the church must mourn over the rampant sin in our nation, including abortion. However, let’s trust our Lord by sticking to his mission (disciple-making) with his prescribed methods of teaching the word and gospel-centered, day-in day-out ministries through the local church as our best approach to this and every other issue. It will be through individual lives changed by the gospel that people will choose life instead of abortion.

Eric Davis

Posts Twitter

Eric is the pastor of Cornerstone Church in Jackson Hole, WY. He and his team planted the church in 2008.
  • http://thecripplegate.com Jesse Johnson

    Eric,
    Thanks for writting ths. It is very helpful in thinking through how a church should view these kind of “invitation” (which are really more like ultimatims). I can’t help but see how arbitrary thier approach is; If you don’t join them on dates they have chosen, with a method they have chosen, wiht people they have chosen, at places they have chosen, then you must not care about abortion. Thanks for your wisdom on this issue.

  • Tom

    So, corporate prayers of repentance for a nation are a waste of time?

    • http://thecripplegate.com Jesse Johnson

      I”ll step on Eric’s toes here…but there is a huge difference between corporate and public. Its not so much that public prayers are often a waste of time, as it is that they tend toward pretentiousness as sparks fly upward. Pray at your church, pray in your closet, pray without ceasing. But pray in a visible way, publicly, for the point of others seeing your prayers? Not so sure.

      • Inclement Nimbus

        The visible, public way that you mention almost borders on the Pharisaical approach that we often read about IMO

    • Eric Davis

      Tom,

      I agree w/ Jesse’s comment here. Also, I would never say that prayer is a waste of time. However, what is one’s motive behind a corporate prayer of repentance for the nation, as opposed to a non-corporate? There is a sense in which that kind of praying can be patronizing. Pray for our nation, amen and amen (1 Tim 2:1-8). No form of prayer is more effective, unless the motive is impure, of course. We can be sure that as we pray in private and in our churches that God hears.

    • Larry

      Tom, the tension is to pray for the nations while you watch them dive deeper into sin. When the tension is there, obey the scriptures and leave the outcome to God. God’s word NEVER returns void. The purposes are His. Experientially, nations don’t repent. Even Jesus had to curse Jerusalem while he yet lamented over them.

  • Mike

    So, are you saying it is always wrong to protest abortion clinics? I get some of the points you make that Jesse points out, but this article almost sounds like you are against any group that does this in a peaceful way, with or without signs.

    • Eric Davis

      Mike-

      I would not say that it is always wrong to protest an abortion clinic. That was not the point I was attempting to make. My point is less about protesting and more about our understanding of the problem behind what you are protesting along w/ your proposed solution to that problem. Caution, wisdom, and some Col 4:5-6 & 1 Tim 2:1-2 is needed, all couched in understanding the mission of the church. Also, the way in which we approach an atrocious sin as this, must nevertheless be done in a way that is truly spiritual. In other words, the fruit of the Spirit must motivate and characterize how we seek to go about addressing these issues.

      • anon

        Eric, this is a good article and something I hope that you will write about again because it is so complex and has been going on for awhile. I am on OSA’s mailing list because I like to receive their bible reading plan once a year. Occasionally I read their monthly newsletters. But I have noticed that they confuse the true gospel of Jesus Christ with protesting abortion. They call their protests and their public preaching against abortion “taking the gospel to the streets.” They seemingly have made protesting against abortion the same as sharing the gospel. At least they have so blurred the lines with their speech and their actions that it is hard to tell exactly what they believe. In addition to this, they have joined hands with Roman Catholics in the fight against abortion and so once again the true gospel of Jesus Christ is lost…lost in a muddle of protests, hand picking scriptures and mishandling them, etc. The true gospel is that Jesus Christ died, was buried and rose again on the third day. He died for sinners; He died to rescue us from the wrath of God and to reconcile us to God. Jesus Christ came on a rescue mission for sinners – all sinners – not just abortionists or women who have abortions, or for those who sin against women by impregnating them out of wedlock, or those who tell a pregnant woman to get an abortion. Jesus Christ came to rescue sinners and those who believe in Him and put their trust in His work on the cross will be saved.
        There are two (at least) more angles to this. Some are fearful that we are ignoring abortion and will go down in history to seem like the Christians who supposedly could have but did not prevent the holocaust during WWII. The other part of this is that our nation is under judgment. Children are being killed because we have turned our backs on God. Our nation has become more and more pagan, ungodly and immoral. As a result people are sacrificing their children on the altar of selfishness. Abortion is nothing more than “civilized” child sacrifice.

        • Eric Davis

          Anon-

          Thanks for your insight here. You made my point when you said OSA “made protesting against abortion the same as sharing the gospel.” Both their literature, their method, and approach declares it to be so.

  • http://mriccardi.blogspot.com Mike Riccardi

    Amen, Eric. A spot-on evaluation, and so well-said. I especially appreciate the final paragraph exhorting us to press on in the mission Christ has given us.

    I think we see an example in this group of something that all of us are prone to: namely, taking a hobby horse and making it the be-all end-all of the Christian life. Granted, the issue of abortion in our country is sickening and evil. But this shows how we can take good causes (like being against abortion) and make them idols. The reality is: It’s easier to hate abortion and not condone it in any way than it is to truly hate all of our sin and fight earnestly to put it to death in our lives.

    Thanks again, brother.

    • anon

      Mike I think that is a good point. It can be like an idol and/or a hobby horse. And satan does not care if we are protest abortion, IF it also means that the true gospel is lost in the process and Christians are too busy fighting abortion to share their faith with others. These groups often use the terminology “pro-life gospel.” Yes Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life. But that is not what they mean. They are equating being prolife with the biblical gospel. Yes Christians should be pro-life. But Jesus Christ has come to rescue us from our greatest problem. What is our greatest problem? Abortion? No, it is that we are sinners, all of us. We are sinners and under God’s wrath and judgment, if we are without Christ. THis is our greatest problem, not abortion, as terrible and as evil as it is. Our greatest problem is sin and our greatest need is salvation from sin and wrath and reconciliation with our Creator.

  • Inclement Nimbus

    Eric thank you for taking the time and writing this piece. I think your final paragraph bringing it all together is the biblical approach and something we would have seen in the early church onwards.

  • http://www.facebook.com/devin.pellew Devin Pellew

    Eric,

    Thank you for the article brother. There are a couple points though that I would like to bring up. I am not at all affiliated with OSA but I am one though who goes out to the abortion clinic and will stand with others in prayer and peaceful protest.

    You said in your first point


    No one can repent on behalf of another. We pray to God for the repentance of the unregenerate in our nation, but we cannot do the repenting for them. Each individual is responsible for his/her own sin before God. I can no more repent for others than I can vicariously come to faith in Christ for another. I can grieve the sin in and around me, but I can only repent of my own actions. Plus, the church is no more responsible for the murder of the unborn than of the born. The true church love Christ, people, and will be held accountable for failure to obey her mission and preach the whole counsel of God, but not for murders she did not commit.”

    I agree we can not repent for others, but I think you are missing the point. As one who goes out to the clinic and works with other groups I can tell you there are 8 Catholic churches to every one protestant church. It is a NIGHTMARE to try and get protestants to come down to the clinic and engage in prayer and peaceful protest.

    If down the street from where you live there was a death camp for women and men could bring there wives down there to have them executed against there will I would imagine that churches from ALL OVER would be down there to protest and demand justice. Even if it was legal we still would not be able to sleep. It is NO different with the abortion Mills where instead of adult women there are babies being murdered instead. Where are all the protestants? Down at the latest leadership conferences and passion events. This is SHAMEFUL and ALL who would call themselves a Christian should be down there in prayer and peaceful protest. The stats do not lie. One of the groups I work with “The 40 days for life” says :

    5,928 babies saved … 23 abortion centers closed
    http://www.40daysforlife.com/blog/

    This is movement started in 2007. Every campaign there are HUNDREDS of lives spared so the peaceful protest and prayer certainly save lives. I know for a fact that the huge mega churchs in evangelicalism for the most part would never dream of publicly addressing abortion from the pulpit. They may talk about human trafficking and poverty but those are things everyone agrees is bad. When it comes to abortion there is deafening silence from protestants and I do think that the church is somewhat responsible. for not doing more. There is a church down the street from our clinic that has over 7,000 people. How long would the clinics stay open if everyday 100 people came out to protest the evil actions???

    As Edmund Burke said “all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

    You then said

    ” OSA limits the scope of sin to abortion and the lack of protesting the issue. They miss the point from Scripture that sin is far more comprehensive. The church’s repentance and eradication of abortion will not bring healing to the land, genuine conversion will. True healing comes from the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit causing a mourning over one’s comprehensive failure to love God, along with a rejoicing at the righteousness provided by Jesus Christ through faith. Healing will be clear, not so much by the absence of abortion (though we greatly desire that), but a presence of embracing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and the abiding fruit of the Spirit.”

    Scott Klusendorf has written an excellent article that answers these objections. Here is some of the article that answers this

    “First, it does not follow that because cultural reformers cannot make a culture blameless before God, we shouldn’t try to make it better for the weak and oppressed. I do not know of a single pro-life leader, for example, who argues that cultural reform can save souls eternally; only the gospel does that. The fact that cultural reform cannot get a man to heaven, however, does not mean that it cannot (in many cases through political means) save him from injustice here on earth. In short, pro-life advocates like me do not work for change in culture to save the world from spiritual death, but to save the most vulnerable members of the human family, the unborn, from physical death.
    Second, the goal of cobelligerent cultural reform is not necessarily to change the hearts of individuals (whether saved or lost), but to restrain their evil acts. Martin Luther King, Jr., put it well: “It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that’s pretty important.”3 The purpose of government, according to Scripture, is not to ensure salvation, but to promote justice (Rom.13:1‑4). The primary purpose of the church, of course, is to preach the gospel of Christ, but if Christians, collectively, do not also challenge government to fulfill its duty to protect the weak and defenseless, who will?
    Third, the notion that “there can be no real cultural impact apart from the transforming power of the gospel of Jesus Christ” sounds good, but it is simply incorrect. Consider the moral evil of slavery in America, which did not end because of mass conversions to Christ. It ended when believers and nonbelievers joined forces to stand against it—and paid for it with the lives of 360,000 Union soldiers. Was the abolition of slavery not a “real” cultural improvement? True, it did not make those who participated right with God, but it did take the physical whips off the backs of oppressed people. That is moral and cultural improvement by any reasonable standard.
    Fourth, it is not spiritually unacceptable for Christians to mobilize with non-Christians for causes other than preaching the gospel. Prior to the Civil War, Protestant clergy worked with non-Christians and organized the Underground Railroad to free black slaves. Anyone who thinks that God’s people are wasting their time pursuing social justice may want to take a look at how important it is to God: Jeremiah5:26‑28;9:24; Isaiah1:16‑17,21‑23;58:6‑7;61:8; Psalm94:1‑23; Proverbs24:1‑12; Matthew25:41‑46.”
    http://www.equip.org/articles/should-christians-be-cobelligerents-in-ecumenical-coalitions/

    Again I am not with OSA and I agree with most of your other points, I just wanted to respond primarily to your first point. I am a protestant and I am reformed in my soteriology as well. I

    • Eric Davis

      Devin,

      Thank you for your thoughtful post. Assuming the stats are true, I’m grateful to hear how the Lord has used the 40 days ministry. In regards to your first point, I would stick to what I said about vicarious repentance and OSA’s philosophy of ministry. I disagree whole-heartedly w/ the idea that the church is “responsible” for abortion. It’s one thing to say that the church should be more faithful within our prescribed mission to address issues in the prescribed way..but quite another to ascribe responsibility for the act of the particular sin. I am all for “doing something” about the issue, but I am even more for doing something under the prescribed mission and method. However we seek to go about this, it must be in line w/ Scripture, and the method has got to be fueled and characterized by the fruit of the Spirit. I often (but not always) see a lack of both in some of these movements who chose protesting as their method.

      This whole thing is a really tough issue, b/c its difficult as regenerate people to live in an unregenerate society, especially one in which the manifestations of unregeneration will increase (2 Tim 3:13). Even so, we have to be wise in how we think to address the widespread, rank manifestation of depravity. God has given all things we need (2 Pet 1:3) to address them, and we need to stick to them. Though we are deeply grieved about the depravity, including our own, and the injustices, we know that Christ will bring in the kingdom one day and so make all wrongs right. In the meantime, our kingdom is not of this world and so we preach Christ crucified.

      Now, I agree w/ much of what you said in regards to the point on cultural transformation. Certainly we would all agree that the abolition of America slavery was a great victory, and I agree w/ MLK Jr.’s quote there. I would still say, though, that our great Head of the Church knows what he is doing in regards to cultural transformation within a thoroughly evil society. His implements for that is to build his church, through regenerate people preaching the gospel, and planting disciple-making local churches. We need not think that a political take-over is a superior method, for example, than the aforementioned. Christians in politics and living righteously therein is great, but once again, that method is not superior in accomplishing transformation than the same old one of disciple-making.

  • Larry

    I have done my best in searching the scriptures to find a pooling of resources in the “early church” relative to protesting the Roman government and its oppression of its citizens (Christians included) through high taxes, rent, murder rate (against Christians) sexual immorality, i.e, homosexuality, lesbianism, pedophilia, pornography, incest, prostitution, etc, and have found no indicators.

    Abortion? It’s as old as the OT. Lev. 18:21. Jer. 32:35. God said abortion is so detestable that even He couldn’t “think it up.” Point is, you’ve never seen the saints of the OT or NT holding rallies, demonstrations, marches, etc to protest sinful activity in the “world.”

    What you read is, they lived separated lives unto God and in the New Covenant we have a responsibility to share the good news of the Gospel to lost sinners. THEN, post conversion, when they can “hear” what the Spirit says, they can be discipled and pursue the “put off’s” and “put on’s” of scripture.

    However, these loud talking, bullying, ultra-aggressive, t-shirt wearing, sign toting, bull-horn speaking para-military, quasi-Christian “haters of sin” seem to be of another ilk.

    Jesus didn’t “stomp a hole” into Zacchaeus, who was a financial terrorist for the Roman government. He simply advised him to come out of the tree and have lunch with him. After lunch and dialogue with Jesus, Zacchaeus was “whole” man, ready to re-pay up to 400 percent of what he had stolen from people. But you never see Zacchaeus holding demonstrations and protesting the Roman government. Hmmm…….

  • John_D_11

    Eric –

    Just wondering if the group took any issue with the antler arches they protested beneath. Doesn’t Deuteronomy also say something about not killing or eating 4 footed animals (perhaps even a little more in context….?)

    Best
    JD

    • Eric Davis

      John-

      I suppose that would be consistent w/ their hermeneutic.

      Hope you’re doing well, brother. Thanks for stopping by.

  • Deb

    I have been mulling over this post since I read it yesterday morning. I live in a similar town to Jackson, just in Montana. We too have an abortion provider, one of only a handful in the whole state. One interesting thing I have noticed about the protesters, and this is a total aside from theological issues is that they are from out of our state. You only have to live in MT or WY about 5 minutes to realize that the person with the least credibility/respect is the out of towner protesting anything, be it a “Jesus statue” on Big Mountain or abortion, but I digress……

    I volunteer on Wednesdays at our local pregnancy center. We could always use more volunteers, more prayers, more donations, more money (maybe even the money that it costs to travel to remote western states). There are many opportunities to share the gospel, disciple and just meet the physical needs of our clients. We have 2 areas of ministry, a clinic, that provides ultrasounds and Lord willing allows women to see the baby they are carrying and choose to carry to term and a resource center, that provides for the material needs of our clients by having them “earn mommy dollars” which can be used for diapers, or any other baby items. We have videos and lessons on parenting, baby care, postpartum issues, etc. etc. We meet with them every two weeks and truly develop a relationship.

    This is not a perfect solution, nothing is, but I do believe that it is a more God honoring way to be pro life than protesting. I have never done anything proactive about abortion until now and it can be depressing work, the only way to truly keep at it is to trust God’s sovereignty as not all women make the best decisions even after deciding to parent……

    So, if you are considering even a peaceful protest, I would propose that there is a better, not perfect, but better alternative.

    • Eric Davis

      Deb,

      Thanks for the comment. I appreciate the wisdom and I think what you’re doing is much more along the lines of Scripture.

  • Kelly Randolph

    Eric, thanks for this post. I am in Wichita, KS where OSA did a lot of work a few years ago. I initially got involved with some of the prayer and protest at our local abortion clinic. I eventually broke off any work with this group for the reasons you mention in this post. In addition, they stated that pastors were not doing their job if they didn’t tell their congregations who to vote for. That was it for me.

    • Eric Davis

      Kelly-

      I think your decision was wise. Thanks for your comment.