January 15, 2013

Machen and the Shocks of Life

by Steve Meister

I am so thankful for the active obedience of Christ. No hope without it.

These are some of the final words of one of the great reformers and theologians of themodern era, J. Gresham Machen. Their simplicity, truth, and earnestness summarize his life and ministry quite well. Refusing to heed the warnings of his friends, Machen added a trip to North Dakota in December, 1936, to his already harried calendar. He wanted to help a struggling new church plant – a relatively small group of Christians – and while there he contracted pneumonia and died on New Year’s Day, 1937. 76 years ago, this month.

He sent this final expression of assurance in Christ in a telegram to his friend and compatriot, John Murray, from the hospital that was his final residence in this life. Machen’s hope as he died was the simple truth of the Gospel that he had lived to defend and died to spread.  

Machen is a hero that I first acquired in seminary, and I believe he should be one of your heroes, too (see Heb 13:7). He was both a great theologian and a great popularizer of biblical theology, which is a combination that does not come very often. And during the early twentieth century, when the specter of liberalism seemed to overshadow everything and there was no end to the moderates who were willing to compromise on matters that are not up for discussion, Machen saw the issues at hand clearly. He understood over what and exactly why Christians must fight. Eventually leading a departure from Princeton Seminary, after it had been reorganized under the auspices of moderate and liberal influences, Machen founded Westminster Theological Seminary alongside other notable figures – such as John Murray and Cornelius Van Til.

On contending for the faith (Jude 3), he perceptively remarked:

The type of religion which rejoices in the pious sound of traditional phrases, regardless of their meanings, or shrinks from ‘controversial’ matters, will never stand amid the shocks of life. In the sphere of religion, as in other spheres, the things about which men are agreed are apt to be the things that are least worth holding; the really important things are the things about which men will fight (Christianity and Liberalism).

 

Trust me, Christianity and Liberalism remains a must read, it is a true modern classic. If you read it and replace every occurrence of “scientific” with “post-modern” and “liberal” with “contemporary evangelical” you will see why it is still in print.

You may find it and other works by and about Machen at Monergism. John Piper also covered his life in a biographic message. For a well-written treatment of his life and thought, see Stephen Nichols’ Machen: A Guided Tour. D.G. Hart wrote a definitive and illuminating biography, Defending the Faith. Personally, I spent New Year’s Day dipping into his Selected Shorter Writings.

J. Gresham Machen stood amid the shocks of life and faced the grave with the simple truth that is our entire hope – Jesus Christ, God Himself, became a man for us and for our salvation. However you start the New Year, spend some time rejoicing in that simple truth yourself. There is no hope without it.

Steve Meister

Posts

Steve is the associate pastor of River City Grace Church, in Sacramento, CA.
  • kevin2184

    Hi Steve, I think the second use of the word “theologian” in the sentence following the Hebrews 13:7 reference should be the word “theology”. Please delete my post regardless. :-)

    • http://www.affectedbytruth.com/ Steve Meister

      Thanks, Kevin – I fixed that typo. Let’s just leave your comment for the sake of posterity. Blessings to you.

  • Paul Eastlack

    Thanks for the article Sreve. I have appreciated Machen as well. On a side issue, you quoted him; “I am so thankful for the active obedience of Christ”. Do you hold to the active obedience of Christ, and would it be fundamental to His atoning work?

    • http://www.affectedbytruth.com/ Steve Meister

      Thanks, Paul. Yes, I do. Though I would register the typical clarifications over the traditional terminology (i.e., “active” and “passive”) over which many folks trip – such as assuming that our Lord’s life or person can be parsed neatly into two categories. The main idea I believe we want to emphasize that the whole of our Lord’s life was vicarious, not just His death, and that He fulfilled both the precepts and penalties on our behalf.

      I like how Calvin addressed this matter (Institutes, II.16.5): “When it is asked then how Christ, by abolishing sin, removed the enmity between God and us, and purchased a righteousness which made him favourable and kind to us, it may be answered generally, that he accomplished this by the whole course of his obedience.”

    • http://www.affectedbytruth.com/ Steve Meister

      Thanks, Paul. Yes, I do. Though I would register the typical clarifications over the traditional terminology (i.e., “active” and “passive”) over which many folks trip – such as assuming that our Lord’s life or person can be parsed neatly into two categories. The main idea I believe we want to emphasize that the whole of our Lord’s life was vicarious, not just His death, and that He fulfilled both the precepts and penalties on our behalf.

      I like how Calvin addressed this matter (Institutes, II.16.5): “When it is asked then how Christ, by abolishing sin, removed the enmity between God and us, and purchased a righteousness which made him favourable and kind to us, it may be answered generally, that he accomplished this by the whole course of his obedience.”

  • Daniel J. Phillips

    “Fight”?!

    Tsk. With talk like that, Machen would so be blacklisted by TGC & friends’ blogs!

    • http://www.affectedbytruth.com/ Steve Meister

      Thanks, Dan. Yes, you may be right… we want to circle around the center, but we do need boundaries around which to circle the wagons, too! Keep fightin’ in TX, brother!