August 8, 2012

Loving your enemies with the sword

by Jesse Johnson
Men_fighting2_0

Elisha at war

Yesterday I argued that the biblical case for pacifism is wanting, and that there are times when Christians are expected to use physical force in the suppression of evil. I want to grant that there is a tension between loving your enemies and using the sword against your enemies–yet both are commanded by God. How do they work together?

The clearest example of these two principles working in concert is in the life of Elisha. Perhaps no one in Israel’s history had more opportunities to demonstrate love for his enemies than Elisha, yet we also see that he was hardly a pacifist.

Elisha was God’s chosen messenger in particularly hostile times. His predecessor, Elijah, was run out of the country when the Queen ordered him murdered as punishment for killing the priests of a false god. Rejected by Israel, he fled to Egypt and begged God to take his life.

Instead, God gave him a final task: to anoint Elisha as his successor (1 Kings 19:16). Thus Elisha became a prophet with no shortage of enemies. The Israelite king stood opposed to him—and would soon command his army to take his life—and Elisha was reviled in the surrounding nations as well. He was hated by those who hated Yahweh; he was opposed by those who served Baal; and he was ambushed by the armies that were waging war against Israel. He was betrayed by his friends, doubted by his followers, and despised by nearly everyone else.

Yet he responded by consistently loving his enemies.

This is not to say that he was a pacifist. In fact, when God first made Elisha a prophet, Yahweh said that he would use Elisha to “put to death” the worshipers of Baal (1 Kings 19:17). At one point, when a mob of nearly 50 people surrounded him, peppering him with insults, God sent bears into the crowd mauling them (2 Kings 2:23-24). When Elisha was with the Israelite army in a battle against Moab, he waited until God caused the Moabites to hallucinate, and then he instructed the Israelites to strike them down (2 Kings 3). So Elisha was not adverse to violence.

Still, the record of his life reflects that he showed a persistent love to his worst enemies. He choose Jericho—a city filled with Yahweh’s enemies—as the site of his first public miracle. Hundreds of years earlier God had declared that anyone who dared to settle there would be cursed (Joshua 6:26). Yet Elisha cleansed their land and purified their water, effectively ending the curse against this city (2 Kings2:18-22, 4:38-44).

The Syrians were Israel’s most dangerous and feared enemy. When Elisha was a teenager, the Syrians plundered the temple and kidnapped the royal family (1 Kings 20:2-3). When Israel joined forces with Judah to defend their shared boarder from Syrian incursion, the Syrians not only killed wicked King Ahab, but tried to assassinate the God-fearing king of Judah, Jehoshaphat.

But despite their national animosity, when the leader of the Syrian army contracted leprosy, he sought out Elisha. In fact, at the time Naaman came to Elisha, the Syrian army was preparing to attack Israel and besiege her capital city. That siege was so drastic and severe that it would force the Israelites to cannibalism in order to survive (2 Kings 6:24-31). And still, when Naaman came to Elisha for help, Elisha did not see a wicked general, but instead saw a man who was humbled by circumstances, and ready to turn to God in faith. Elisha told his enemy how to be healed—essentially by trusting in Yahweh—and Naaman believed. In fact, the Syrian general responded to his restored skin with a confession of faith that no Israelite king would ever make: “Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth, but in Israel” (2 Kings 5:14).

No one event crystallizes Elisha’s love for his enemies as much as the attempt on his life described in 2 Kings 6. Because he was aiding the Israelite military, the Syrian king ordered his men to ambush and kill Elisha. In the middle of the night, Elisha’s house was surrounded by “horses and chariots and a great army” sent by the Syrians to assassinate him (2 Kings 6:14).

Elisha, unarmed yet unafraid, went out to the Syrians. They moved into position to strike, but were momentarily blinded by Yahweh. They were then supernaturally deceived, and thought that Elisha was their leader. Elisha took advantage of his change in fortune, and led the entire Syrian strike-force on a ten-mile journey deep into Israel. He took them to the capital, had the city doors opened, and led the deluded soldiers inside.When the door behind them closed, their eyes were opened, and the Syrians realized that they had been taken captive.

The Israelite King reasonably wanted to slaughter his newly arrested enemies. But Elisha refused. Instead he commanded the king to “set bread and water before them, that they may eat and drink and go to their master” (2 Kings 6:22). Not content with merely giving them bread and water, Elisha saw to it that this captive band of his enemies was served “a great feast” (v. 23). In fact, Elisha himself personally prepared it for people who moments earlier were trying to kill him.

Elisha is the embodiment of the two commands that are often in tension: he loved his enemies to his own detriment. Yet he was also unafraid to bear the sword. When the enemies were his enemies, he fed them, healed them, and freed them. But when he was with the Israelite army, he wielded the sword powerfully. This is the model for us as well. When we are wronged personally, we should turn the other cheek. But we should not apply that standard corporately, and assume that those who love God eschew the military. If you are a soldier, serve justly and valiantly, following in the footsteps of Elisha, who was a man who loved his enemies.

A section of today’s post is from my chapter “Real Men Love their Enemies” in Men of the Word, which is available by clicking on the link in the sidebar.

 

Jesse Johnson

Posts Twitter Facebook

Jesse is the Teaching Pastor at Immanuel Bible Church in Springfield, VA.
  • Kip’ Chelashaw

    “When we are wronged personally, we should turn the other cheek. But we should not apply that standard corporately, and assume that those who love God eschew the military. If you are a soldier, serve justly and valiantly, following in the footsteps of Elisha, who was a man who loved his enemies.”

    These last two sentences are key and especially remind us that as individuals we do not have the automatic right to freely bear the sword but that this is a thing vested to certain God-ordained authorities e.g. the State (Romans 13:4) who of course can ask specific individuals to kill others (e.g. criminals or those we are at war with)

    Good article.

    K

  • Flyingshark

    I thought Jesus said to “put down that sword”

    • http://thecripplegate.com Jesse Johnson

      yeah, but notice the reason he gave. It was not out of a desire for pacifism, nor was it a validation of his arrest. Obviously the large picture is that his arrest fulfills prophecy. But the immediate reason he gave Peter was if Peter wields a sword against police, he can expect to die of capital punishment. In fact, his words are so axiomatic that it is even a saying now in English. Even in the NFL! Live by the blitz, die by the blitz.

  • http://almostreadytogoamish.blogspot.com/ Rational νεόφυτος

    Whenever I hear arguments defending Christians bearing the carnal sword, it reminds me of reading my paedobaptist pals and how they strain to defend the practice of sprinkling water on unrepentant babies and ridiculously call it a “sacrament”. It’s just not in the NT anywhere, so they strain and labor to draw OT parallels, which is what you seem to be doing here. Also consider, wielding the carnal sword is not without it’s consequences. King David was unable to build the holy temple, although he longed to, because he had a lifetime of “blood on his hands”. (I Chron. 21 – 29)

    I appreciate what your doing here Jesse, and I know this is a difficult topic to address (trust me – my Dad is a grizzled ol’ Army vet, and I’m endlessly proud of him and his service, but we’ve had not a few discussions about my own feelings about what I believe scripture teaches about bearing the sword, particularly when he gives me the business about one of my son’s going into the military someday, which I assure him will not happen… :)
    But as a reformed, confessional Baptist, I think that the divines who put together these docs had the right idea… the carnal sword isn’t to be used by Christians, but by the government leaders whom we believe that God put into place (Rom. 13). Of course, that doesn’t sit well in red states like the one I live in…. :)

    Q. 105. What doth God require in the sixth commandment?
    A. That neither in thoughts, nor words, nor gestures, much less in deeds, I dishonor, hate, wound, or kill my neighbor, by myself or by another; but that I lay aside all desire of revenge; also, that I hurt not myself, nor willfully expose myself to any danger. Wherefore also the magistrate is armed with the sword to prevent murder.

    Another confession, of the beard-wearing Mennonites of whom I’m appreciative, from Dordrecht also summarizes my thoughts well:

    “…to oppose an enemy with the sword, we believe and confess that the Lord Christ has forbidden and set aside to His disciples and followers all revenge and retaliation, and commanded them to render to no one evil for evil, or cursing for cursing, but to put the sword into the sheath, or, as the prophets have predicted, to beat the swords into ploughshares.”

    • http://thecripplegate.com Jesse Johnson

      A few differences from me and those confessions. I see a difference between corporate and individual ethics. If you are persecuted, don’t repay with evil. But Romans 13 makes clear the reason you don’t is because the government will. So agents of the gov., even if they are Christians, do need to punish evil. Second, there are some kingdom differences between me and the Mennonites. Swords to plowshares comes after the second coming, not before. I appreciate your integrity and desire to honor the Lord, as evidenced by the thought and research you have put into this issue. 

  • Michael Delahunt

    As an aside, where does it say that Jehoshaphat died at the hands of the Syrians?

    • http://thecripplegate.com Jesse Johnson

      Right you are. In 1 Kings 22 he was spared. The Syrians tried to kill him, but he escaped. I was thinking of the story in 1 Chron 18, but there he doesn’t die either–only his ships get smashed (he made an alliance with Ahaziah against the Syrians, I think). Anyway, I’ll fix it above. Good catch. 

  • Guest

    Pastor Jesse – Thank you for your blog, it is very helpful. I left an email to your church’s website address asking a question about evangelism if you have some time to answer.

    Blessings

    • http://thecripplegate.com Jesse Johnson

      Got it today. Thanks.

      • Michael Tiplea

        Couldn’t sleep tonight and decided to piggy bad on old articles. Thank you for making that great point about personal and corporate ethics. that is the key.