July 20, 2011

Jesus Never Said That

The following is a citation from a current writing project, “Suburbianity.”

Let’s be honest, the desire for personal fulfillment is what fills many churches and moves the majority of Christian books. It’s an ever-present tease. It’s the life-coach guy disguised as a preacher, a romantic ballad disguised as a Christian song and a self-help seminar disguised as a sermon. It’s everywhere. It hooks us all. “You too can have impactful and an influential life.” “You can do something great.” Some authors and pastors come right out and guarantee it. “Do these few things and your life will change.”

Even in those instances when authors go out of their way to stress the fact that it’s not about you, they go on for two hundred pages to talk about you. Even if the subject is heaven, it’s not about enjoying God’s Glory and the Lamb slain for all eternity. It’s about how we can escape our unsatisfactory conditions and all the pagans here on earth. Even if it is about finding God’s will, it’s not really about God’s will. It’s about God recognizing how useful we are to Him. When they stress the importance of service, it’s not really about others. It’s about the satisfaction we can get in serving others. When they encourage you to pray, it’s not about communion with God as much as it’s about satisfying your soul’s spiritual itch. Even when they stress community it’s not about a group of people suffering for the sake of the Gospel. It’s about you finding a place of significance. Words like best, purpose, authentic, influence, intentional are deliberate. They’re buzzwords for nominal suburban Christians. We eat them up. We love them.

There’s good reason. These themes tap into the deep ache from which every human on this planet suffers. A vacancy we all know is there and can’t ignore. A growl of our soul we spend our lives trying to satisfy with all the wrong stuff. People. Money. Success. Possessions. Appearances. Sex. But none of this quite fits that space. So we move on to the next thing. We go on wandering the planet not knowing who we really are, or what we’re supposed to be doing. Our legacy is comprised of tasks, routines, the latest TV series, soccer practices and grocery lists. We’re nomadic and homeless. Empty. So, we ache. This is not as God intended. We’re meant for so much more. Believe me, there is something that fits that hole in your life. It’s out there and you can find it. When you do, you’ll know it. It’s an encounter destined to change us forever. A point from which we can never return. A bench mark. We are never the same. Like when Moses wandered into the path of a burning bush, things change. At that moment he found himself and what he was supposed to be. Your burning bush awaits.

See how easy that was. Admit it! You were sucked right into the vortex of the best-seller list. I had you. Open mouth and insert hook. You were thinking, “My life is about to change. I’m not settling for mediocre anymore. I’m going to start journaling.” I was Billy Blazes and you were about to buy a squeegee you didn’t need. Without even realizing it we did a one-eighty right back to us and our happiness. Deepak Chopra could have written that. He probably has somewhere. There is nothing uniquely Christian about it. What? You’ve been drinking this “kool-aide?”  It’s not Christianity. It’s ‘Suburbianity.”

“Suburbianity” is the general conviction among professing evangelicals that the primary aim of Christ’s death was to provide us with a fulfilled life. It’s subtle, but it’s pervasive. It comes through in nearly all forms of Christian media  – from songs to books. God has big plans for you. You are important. You should not be discontented. There’s more out there for you. This is the suburban gospel. By it we’re saving countless sinners from a poor self-image and an absence of fulfillment, but not from a Holy God.

This message has been recycled and repackaged so many times it’s impossible to count the versions. It’s easy to get caught up in it. It’s been here from the beginning of time. Satan used it on Eve. You’re important. You’re happiness is essential. Don’t let anything hold you back. Blah! Blah! Blah! The only difference between Eve and us is that she had to be convinced God didn’t want her happiness. Nowadays, it’s all God wants!

Christianity is not about any of that ridiculous nonsense. In fact, this message is stripping the Church of its power. It’s not even biblical. You can’t find it anywhere in the Bible. Even if you cite Moses and his encounter with a fiery shrub, he would be shocked what we’ve done with his story. Even if you make Jesus say these things, he didn’t. Jesus never commissioned anything close to this. We’ve made all this stuff up. “But,” someone will object, “God wants us to be happy. Jesus said in John 10:10 that he came to give us ‘life more abundantly.’” But, this is exactly my point. That’s what we assume because we read the Bible through the grid of self. These types of takeaways are the byproduct of a narcissistic hermeneutic. There’s no way to read the Gospels or the Epistles at face value and come away thinking that Jesus walked this earth delivering a self-improvement seminar. That never happened.

Now, admittedly, I’m a skeptic. I am the perpetual enemy of the status quo. It can sound as if I’m throwing all practical teaching under the bus. But, I’m not. What would I do with the book of Proverbs? I don’t mean to suggest happiness and purpose aren’t effects of the gospel. Indeed they are. But, biblical happiness and purpose are counterintuitive and dissimilar to our suburban versions. More to the point, happiness and contentment were not the aim of the atonement.

The real danger in all this narcissistic white noise is an assumed Gospel. An assumed Gospel is the real toxin of Suburbianity. Think about it. How many sermons have you sat through which offered principles for life change, or for a better Christian life, but never mentioned the Gospel or any of its elements as the basis for both? How many books have you read on the spiritual life which never mentioned the cross? Countless. Me too. Is this really dangerous? After all, don’t we already have the Gospel in mind by virtue of being Christians? Exactly! That’s the point.

There are countless of decent church folk who assumed for decades that “good” equaled “godly.” Only when someone stopped assuming the gospel and confronted “good people” with the cross did they discover they the truth. They needed to repent of their goodness. We can’t assume it if we are going to be faithful to it.  Without a constant emphasis of the Gospel all our principles for better living end in moralism. Moralism condemns. If you tell a man how he can be a better husband, you must also tell him Christ’s righteousness relieves him of the burden of being a perfect one.

As it is, the Gospel is a ticker running seamlessly across the bottom of evangelicalism. It is the white noise of Christianity. We assume people are saved because we’ve been conditioned to. We hear something “spiritual” and assume Christian. We see “morality” and assume regeneration. We see “good” and assume godly. We see “church attendance” and assume faith in Christ. In all of this we never ask the central question of the Gospel, “In what are you trusting for the salvation of your soul?” We can’t assume the Gospel.

in Shepherding with 15 Comments
  • http://www.housewifetheologian.com Aimee Byrd

    You’ve articulated well the “narcissistic hermeneutic.” Jesus Christ is sufficient; He is our satisfaction and our heart’s desire.

  • Mary Elizabeth Tyler

    Great article, Byron! Loved this statement of yours: ” Without a constant emphasis of the Gospel all our principles for better living end in moralism.”

    Also, John 10:10 is the very verse that draws many to Christ; life more abundant, who wouldn’t want that? But, “when affliction or persecution ariseth for the word’s sake, immediately they are offended (Mark 4:17), and prove to be only for Jesus, when Jesus meets their every selfish desire and need. How terribly sad and tragic.

  • http://twitter.com/beltechi Dan Beltechi

    You make some good points. I see you wrote on Piper’s preaching style, so you must be very familiar with his content as well. I can’t help but think that, by implication, you denounce Piper’s Christian Hedonism as well. Any thoughts on this?

    • Byron

      That was fast. I expected the observation to be made but not so soon. You’re on your game. No, I do not denounce Piper’s (Edwards) basic premise of enjoying God because I think loving God is biblical. But I cannot love God unless He loves me first. Depending on Christ’s work is actually the most glorifying thing I can do.. and the ability to do this comes from God Himself by Grace. Furthermore, God’s love for me is not contingent upon my love for Him. I have at times struggled with the “potential” dilemma which emerges from Piper’s argument – the reason to satisfy yourself with God is because it is satisfying. I don’t think Piper intends to go here. Ultimately, “God is most glorified in us when I am most satisfied in him” is not even possible without the subsitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ. Ultimately, God is glorified in me because of the righteous work of his son despite how satisfied in him I may be at any moment. Piper deals with this question and offers an explanation as to how the Gospel precedes his premise in “God is the Gospel” and other places. Catch his last point in this video clip. http://vimeo.com/1863953

      • http://twitter.com/beltechi Dan Beltechi

        Well, I’m on my game because I’m wrestling through all this and trying to give Piper’s philosophy a hearing (currently reading Desiring God). Now, I get what you’re saying in your reply, but I can imagine Piper saying “amen” to, for example, this:

        “When they stress the importance of service, it’s not really about others. It’s about the satisfaction we can get in serving others” (and a few other points in that paragraph, minus the negative phrasing).

        I think Piper would say that serving out of self-interest isn’t wrong as long as that interest is Christ-centered. I’ll try to get back with some actual quotes from the book later when I have access to it.

        I’m not saying I agree with him (nor trying to misrepresent him); I’m trying to understand and decide what I think about this whole issue.

        (BTW, I really am not being “hostile” in any way, so I hope I don’t come across that way. Thanks for your thoughts.)

        • Byron

          I don’t sense hostility. Appreciate your observations.

    • http://twitter.com/gottheology Trevor M.

      The same point Dan B. made was on my mind as well. Good response. I’ve come across many arguments that point out the “unbiblicalness” of Piper’s thesis of Christian Hedonism while it seems there is a disconnect in understanding Piper’s point along the way. (Not saying Dan was doing that, BTW.) Thanks for making that evident, glad to see I’m not the only one thinking this way. :)

      Side note: I’ve only come across the Cripplegate blog this week and let me say that everything I have read has been fantastic! The “narcissistic hermeneutic” seems like it was something I was thinking for a long time but was just too dumb to get it out of my head and on paper. >.<

      Keep it up.

  • Victoria

    I just love this post. Thank you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001438881321 Amanda Pack Walling

    “Suburbianity”—-love it!

  • Michael Whitcomb

    You had me at “Billy Blazes”.

  • Anonymous

    “Christianity is not about any of that ridiculous nonsense. In fact, this message is stripping the Church of its power. It’s not even biblical. You can’t find it anywhere in the Bible.”

    Do we reformed folks fall for that as well? I mean, we should be hearing the Gospel preached in every sermon (and I am blessed that I do every Sunday), and if one preaches the real Gospel and real bible truth, then none of that is preached, even if we don’t read our bibles we don’t hear that kind of stuff coming from the pulpit. We should know that “happiness and contentment were not the aim of the atonement.”

    Maybe I am just very naive about what goes on in reformed churches. I see, however, that an assumed gospel can be a malady in any kind of church.

    Thank you for you article! Grace and peace!

  • Ho_lee_goast

    Of course “Jesus Never Said That.” Jesus is a fictitious character who appears in books of fiction, aka “the gospels.” The title of your blog should be “Jesus Never Said Anything Because He Never Existed.”

  • Pingback: Is Suburban American Christianity the Real Thing? |

  • Matt

    Provocative and searching, but where was YOUR scripture? Jesus himself speaks our worth (Matt 10:31) … From the first page of scripture our worth and purpose are set forth (Gen 1:27-29).

    Now this idea may have been co-opted, but let’s not throw out the baby with the bath water. Let’s discern between the thoroughly biblical concept of dignity and the cultural cancer if narcissism, lest we rob the gospel of its power to restore the former (Col. 3:1-3; 1 Jn. 3:1-3).

    More to the point, let’s be careful about lambasting the views of others as “unbiblical”while failing to employ the bible to support our own.

    I share many of your views, yet find them somewhat incomplete–this piece smacked a bit of choir-preaching, which is seldom as profitable as thoughtful discourse.

    • Byron

      Noted. Thanks for your comments. Although, my piece was not about our intrinsic value or the Imago Dei. And, if I might… Your reference to Matthew 10:31 makes my point. I’ll use this passage as a biblical support. In context, the passage is about the potential of disciples being persecuted (10:16-23), slandered (10:24-25) and possibly even killed (10:26-31) for following Jesus Christ. The comparison to sparrows (10:29-30) is an argument from lesser to greater intended to reassure us of God’s providence in our life despite the suffering we may face. It is not intended to bolster our self-worth as your comments indicate it does.We are merely more valuable than sparrow. If he is in control of their circumstance, certainly he is in control of ours. 10:32-39 goes on to warn any who might choose their personal well being over devotion to Christ about the dire consequences of doing so. I think the last verse in this passage reinforces my piece. We may be more valuable than sparrows, but we are unworthy of Christ. If we choose our happiness and self-preservation over him, than we are not worthy of him. Life is found by dying to it. Not by finding it. (10:39) I don’t think Jesus said exactly what you suggest he said… contextually that is.

      For example, John Ortberg wrote, “Here is the good news: When you flourish, you become more you. You become that person God had in mind when he thought you up. You don’t jsut become holier. You become you-ier…” If he intends to mean that God executed his son so I could be the me I’ve always wanted to be, then that is a false Gospel.

      What’s interesting Matt, is that I did not intend this to be aimed at the straw men. I really wasn’t intending to preach to the choir about the abuses of seeker gurus. I was speaking to conservative evangelical and the reformed. My church as a matter of fact. The graphics along side the piece give it that sense. I was preaching to me. I too assume the Gospel.Daily.