Archives For Theology

Gospel DrivenThe Book of Philippians is about the Gospel. It’s not quite an exposition of the doctrinal content of the Gospel, like Romans is. And it’s not quite a defense of the Gospel in the face of heresy, like Galatians is. Philippians is more about the implications the Gospel has on the various aspects of our lives as believers. It’s about how we are to live in light of the Gospel. The thesis verse of the letter is Philippians 1:27, in which Paul commands his dear friends to “conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of the Gospel of Christ.”

And in the context of the opposition the Philippians were facing because of their commitment to Christ, living in a manner worthy of the Gospel chiefly involved being united with one another. If the people of God are to have any hope of standing firm in the face of opposition (1:27b)—if they are to have any hope of propagating this Gospel of repentance and faith in Jesus Christ amidst a hostile society (1:27c)—they will need to be unified. And so in the opening verses of chapter 2, Paul calls them to unity—as well as to the humility without which that unity won’t ever be achieved.

Then, in verses 5 to 11, he pens perhaps the loftiest and most precise Christology anywhere else in Scripture. He speaks in detail about the Lord’s pre-existence as the eternal Son of God, the mystery of the incarnation and the kenosis, the hypostatic union—Christ’s being fully God and fully man, having two natures “without confusion, without change, without division, and without separation” bound up in a single person. He speaks of the mystery of the sinless God-man dying: God cursed and forsaken by God. And he speaks of His glorious resurrection from the dead, ascension into heaven, and His exaltation to the Father’s right hand.

Continue Reading…

handwriting (fountain pen)It’s a question that every Christian eventually asks. “Why did God allow the world to go the way it did?” For believers, and often unbelievers, it doesn’t take much to see that God did not have to create a human race destined to fall. He was not obligated to create that tree in the garden, nor was he obliged to allow Satan’s fall, the subsequent deception, Eve’s taking of the fruit, Adam’s sin, and subsequent billions of his image-bearers birthed in high-handed rebellion. Why did he create a world upon which he would pronounce a curse that leaves no corner of the creation, image-bearing or not, without carnage, spiritual and physical?

Sometimes the whole opening scene of our world—the tree, serpent, the innocent pair—on  the surface, it appears as an ominous arrangement. It almost seems scripted for failure.

Why would God seemingly stack up the odds against them? Why couldn’t he have just left the sterilized utopia without the tree, the snake, and the command? Why the curse?

Continue Reading…

Heb 1;3I don’t have anything specifically eloquent or polished today. But I’ve had the privilege of reflecting recently on the glory and presence of God and how Christ is the perfect image of God, and I’d like to celebrate those truths with you.

The Old Testament had much to say about the presence of God. Throughout the history of Israel, God’s presence was mediated through fire (Exod 3:6; Deut 5:4), through blazing light (Exod 33:18–23), through visions (Ezek 1:28) and angels (Jdg 6:21–22; cf. 13:21–22), through the temple worship (Pss 27:4; 63:1–2), and even through God’s own Word (1 Sam 3:21). But with the coming of Jesus and the New Covenant era, the glory of God’s presence is now uniquely and supremely manifested “in the face of Christ” (2 Cor 4:6). This makes sense, of course, because Christ is the perfect “image of God” (2 Cor 4:4).

This is precisely the testimony of the opening verses of the Book of Hebrews. Though God had revealed Himself by speaking to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days He has spoken finally and decisively in His Son (Heb 1:1). Christ is therefore the radiance of the Father’s glory (1:3)—the manifestation of the very presence of God, the “effulgence of the divine glory,” as one commentator colorfully puts it.

Continue Reading…

I will be goodOf all the elder qualifications Paul gives in Titus 1, none causes more hand-wringing and knee-bending than this: An elder must have “faithful children.” What exactly does that mean?

In this post, I am not going to give you my view of that verse. Instead, I want to lay out the three most common views, and briefly give you their strengths and weaknesses. This is one of those issues where we too easily write off opposing views to ours, and it’s my goal here to get you to really think through all three views on their own merits. I call the three views the Evangelical View, the Baptistic View, and the Reformed View. I grant that these are broad categories and over generalizations. Feel free to quibble with my labels, and rebuke me for separating evangelical from baptistic (or whatever), and also feel free to suggest better titles. The point here is just to give this discussion some categories.

Continue Reading…

And [Jesus] also told this parable to some people who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and viewed others with contempt: “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood and was praying this to himself: ‘God, I thank You that I am not like other people: swindlers, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I get.’ But the tax collector, standing some distance away, was even unwilling to lift up his eyes to heaven, but was beating his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, the sinner!’ I tell you, this man went to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles himself will be exalted.”

- Luke 18:9–14 -

This parable from the lips of the Lord Jesus is very instructive for us in the wake of all the attention being given to the Catholic Church, the installation of Pope Francis, and the differences between Catholicism and Protestantism.

Pharisee and Publican

What intrigues me about the Pharisee in this passage is that he thanked God for his moral uprightness and religious devotion. He is not claiming, perhaps like the rich, young ruler did, that he had kept God’s law and thus is deserving of eternal life. He doesn’t believe that he’s earned his salvation by works of righteousness achieved apart from divine grace. No, he goes to thank God for the grace and charity that God had worked in him, by which he has become acceptable to God. He believes that he is justified by his faith in God as well as the good works which proceed from the divinely-imparted righteousness inherent within him. And he does not go to his house justified.

Continue Reading…

abraham isaacWhat’s your first thought when you read that God bids Abraham to slaughter his son Isaac in Genesis 22:2? Notwithstanding our natural abhorrence to child sacrifice, we have just read that God himself outlawed murder (Gen 9:6). We could think that God criminalizes himself by this order but wry readers know that something is amiss.

Until this point, God has only had humanity’s good in mind (cf. Genesis 1–2’s repetition of “good”) and this story is no different, for God’s command works for Abraham’s good. What we might miss is that the story has already taken us, as readers, by the hand to tell us the end from the beginning. Genesis 22:1 says, “God tested Abraham.” As insiders, we know that this is a test.   Continue Reading…