Archives For Steve Meister

Yesterday, I argued that humble popes don’t exist. They’re mythical because it’s categorically impossible to receive the unbiblical role of supreme pontiff, make people kiss your hand and call you “holy father,” and then be able to travel under the descriptor “humble.” The papacy is an act of self-excommunication from the Church, albeit with no small amount of flair. And therein lay the rub and temptation for many Christians.

I heartily agree with Clint’s previous post, and am not suggesting you begin a conversation with Joe Catholics with the foregoing. Yet, I believe it’s pastorally important to remind Christians that the Pope has no clothes. As Rome’s pomp and circumstance gets paraded on CNN, Christians too often begin to view their own churches and traditions with more of a jaundiced eye. In an age of plastic, self-designed spirituality, who can deny the appeal of firm traditions made of stone and mortar? And the traditions of Roman Catholicism would indeed hold beauty, if they weren’t false.

Continue Reading…

francisbusRoman Catholicism is installing Francis as pope today. And much has been made of his bus rides and apartment dwelling back home in Buenos Aires. (The fact that people are impressed by his studied avoidance of opulence actually speaks volumes about Roman Catholicism in general). But while the press fawns and Rome beams over his supposed humility, what should Bible-believing Protestants say? Probably something like this: “How great sin have you heaped up for yourself, when you cut yourself off from so many flocks! For it is yourself that you have cut off. Do not deceive yourself!”

Now that would probably not make the cut for a Christianity Today editorial, like A Pope for All Christians, but it is how Christians responded the first time a bishop in Rome made the incredibly arrogant claim that he was supreme pontiff.

Continue Reading…


Who wants to quibble with the “Gospel-Centered” movement? Certainly, the deck is already stacked in favor of the guy whose position is described as being centered on the Gospel! Yet, with all the real and true good coming from many organizations, conferences, teachers, pastors, and churches who might be aligned with this more recent call to be centered on the Gospel, I nonetheless remain charitably concerned. Concerned, that is, that “Gospel-centered” really means “Gospel-reductionist.”

gospel-centeredKevin DeYoung hit the nail on the head, for me, in his rejoinder to a recent (and somewhat disconcerting review) to his new book, The Hole in Our Holiness:      Continue Reading…

planting-gardenOne of the quirks of Christian unity is that I – an American, free church, premillennial, baptistic pastor – find remarkable affinity with the reflections of one Carl Trueman – a British, Presybterian (OPC!), amillennial, paedobaptist.

A few months ago, Trueman shared an interchange with Sean Lucas and Michael Haykin over the place of “spiritual formation” in theological seminaries. I’ll leave that immediate issue to those more qualified. But I was particularly grateful for Trueman’s final thoughts, where he observed the real difference between a biblical piety and a performance or program-based “spiritual formation.”

Here’s a snippet:   Continue Reading…

I found the juxtaposition startling. I had just finished jotting down notes on John the Baptist’s ministry in Luke 3:1-20, the short of which was “Repent!” I then scanned some news headlines and noticed that Lance Armstrong confessed. Wow! But he did so on a couch next to Oprah. Give me a break.

Repentance translates a Greek term, metanoia (μετάνοια; “change of mind, thought”), that indicates an alteration in one’s perspective that results in a change of behavior or pattern of life. It’s Old Testament roots are shub (שׁוּב; “turn; return”), as in return to God (e.g., Mal 3:7). As the converse side of faith – you turn from sin and turn toward God – repentance is no less the fruit of His sovereign grace as faith itself (e.g., Acts 11:182 Tim 2:25).   Continue Reading…

I am so thankful for the active obedience of Christ. No hope without it.

These are some of the final words of one of the great reformers and theologians of themodern era, J. Gresham Machen. Their simplicity, truth, and earnestness summarize his life and ministry quite well. Refusing to heed the warnings of his friends, Machen added a trip to North Dakota in December, 1936, to his already harried calendar. He wanted to help a struggling new church plant – a relatively small group of Christians – and while there he contracted pneumonia and died on New Year’s Day, 1937. 76 years ago, this month.

He sent this final expression of assurance in Christ in a telegram to his friend and compatriot, John Murray, from the hospital that was his final residence in this life. Machen’s hope as he died was the simple truth of the Gospel that he had lived to defend and died to spread.   Continue Reading…